@tylerturdenpants is this the right way to do this? or are Modifiers classified as something else. Over at ember-codemods/ember-no-implicit-this-codemod#44, I changed some things in this commit: ember-codemods/ember-no-implicit-this-codemod@aebe3e4 🤷‍♂️ I thought I needed to add modifiers to get it working... but... now I don't know what I'm doing. lol.

oh wait, yes I do. I need to remove the visitor assumption

Ya, if it is a type we can get using the built in analyzeEmberObject. When you ask “is this right?” is only when you want to collect information in any other way than the built in function. In that case you would supply your own function to do that.

I’m going to try and add more test coverage. I could use the help tho!

at the moment, this is not the right way to detect modifiers :) ember-codemods/ember-no-implicit-this-codemod@4dcb769

In that case you would supply your own function to do that.

but, in this case, since modifiers should be a built in type, we want it to be part of the default, yeah?

But, in this case, since modifiers should be a built in type, we want it to be part of the default, yeah?

I think so. Modifiers should have type like components, services, etc. However like helpers, we may need another strategy to identify them.

We might have to detect based on module path alone 🤔. Modifiers could be a class or a POJO, don’t have to extend from a common base class, etc.

I think longer term Ember should expose the getModifierManager method which would indicate that a given export is a modifier (we should do the same for getComponentManager because the same issue exists there).

I meant to debug this and see if I could detect what modifiers were -- if it has to be on path - that's fine. Last I got stuck, I needed to look up how to debug inside puppeteer. Haven't done that yet. 🙃

@NullVoxPopuli I can help you today if you want
@rwjblue, should we add the module path to the gather function arguments?

@rwjblue, should we add the module path to the gather function arguments?

yeah, probably

yeah, probably

It's in there ;)